Peer Review Process
All submitted manuscripts, with the exception of specific editorial material (such as editorials, commentaries, and correspondence), are subjected to a rigorous **double-blind peer review** process. This process ensures objectivity by keeping both the authors’ identities and the reviewers’ identities strictly confidential throughout the evaluation.
Review Procedure and Timeline
- Each eligible manuscript is evaluated by at least **two independent expert reviewers** selected by the Associate Editor based on their field of expertise.
- Reviewer comments and recommendations are delivered anonymously to the corresponding author, who is then required to provide necessary revisions and a formal point-by-point response.
- Reviewers are typically requested to submit their full evaluation report within a maximum of **six weeks**.
- The Majalah Patologi Indonesia (IJP) Editorial Team ensures the completeness and quality of all referee reports.
- In cases where securing appropriate specialized reviewers requires additional time, the corresponding author will be notified of any potential delay.
Final Decision
The **Editor-in-Chief** makes the final decision on acceptance, revision, or rejection of the manuscript based on the scientific merit, originality, relevance, and the consensus derived from the independent reviewer reports and the recommendation of the handling Associate Editor.
.jpg)
